Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756582AbYLKKlg (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:41:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755048AbYLKKl2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:41:28 -0500 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:25890 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754988AbYLKKl1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:41:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:41:10 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Jean Delvare Cc: Trond Myklebust , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency Message-ID: <20081211104109.GF23742@kernel.dk> References: <20081211111614.493d2a62@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081211111614.493d2a62@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 961 Lines: 25 On Thu, Dec 11 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > Configuration option LSF has a default which contradicts its help > text. The help text says "if unsure, say Y" but there is no explicit > default, and the default default is N. > > This inconsistency was introduced by commit > 88b9adb073b7a69a54b1b14423103bc24587ebdc. According to the commit > message, we want users to enable this option, so it should default to > Y. I wonder if we just shouldn't get rid of this option and just have the single CONFIG_LBD option control both of these. If you set CONFIG_LBD, you probably want large files as well. And CONFIG_LSF without CONFIG_LBD doesn't make a lot of sense. Would anyone object to such a change? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/