Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756470AbYLKLd2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754908AbYLKLdT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:19 -0500 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:53287 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751130AbYLKLdT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:19 -0500 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Jean Delvare , Trond Myklebust , LKML In-Reply-To: <20081211110839.GH23742@kernel.dk> References: <20081211115844.1b1dbf49@hyperion.delvare> <20081211110839.GH23742@kernel.dk> Message-Id: <20081211202923.330F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.42 [ja] Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:33:15 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 653 Lines: 18 > > No objection from me, getting rid of configuration options almost > > always gets my vote :) > > Yeah, mine too. One recent addition was CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU - why on > earth is that an option?! As far as I know, CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU depend on CONFIG_MMU because any unevictable lru developer don't have nommu machine ;) I expect that nobody of mmu user don't turn off unevictable lru feature. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/