Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757244AbYLKTBv (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:01:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756920AbYLKTBi (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:01:38 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:50446 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756890AbYLKTBh (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:01:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4941636A.3050303@vlnb.net> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:00:58 +0300 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Axboe CC: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , FUJITA Tomonori , Mike Christie , Jeff Garzik , Boaz Harrosh , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Bart Van Assche , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC 13/23]: Export of alloc_io_context() function References: <494009D7.4020602@vlnb.net> <49400F2F.4050603@vlnb.net> <20081211133424.GU23742@kernel.dk> <4941592E.8070303@vlnb.net> <20081211184100.GX23742@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <20081211184100.GX23742@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19SN+qa5HXAiDcFXxQ8wt168iNZ65IWiF7+Yf5 9XG+3Dj1/kzvtsLNdvX5IMzPmDxDKaBaT7iaTUxluRiPYJJMjW nl48/brJBKQBxUjIFz/0Q== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2883 Lines: 67 Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11 2008, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 10 2008, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: >>>> This patch exports alloc_io_context() function. For performance reasons >>>> SCST queues commands using a pool of IO threads. It is considerably >>>> better for performance (>30% increase on sequential reads) if threads in >>>> a pool have the same IO context. Since SCST can be built as a module, >>>> it needs alloc_io_context() function exported. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Bolkhovitin >>>> --- >>>> block/blk-ioc.c | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff -upkr linux-2.6.27.2/block/blk-ioc.c linux-2.6.27.2/block/blk-ioc.c >>>> --- linux-2.6.27.2/block/blk-ioc.c 2008-10-10 02:13:53.000000000 +0400 >>>> +++ linux-2.6.27.2/block/blk-ioc.c 2008-11-25 21:27:01.000000000 +0300 >>>> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct io_context *alloc_io_context(gfp_ >>>> >>>> return ret; >>>> } >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_io_context); >>> Why is this needed, can't you just use CLONE_IO? >> There are two reasons for that: >> >> 1. kthread interface doesn't support passing CLONE_IO flag. > > Then you fix that instead of working around it! :-) It doesn't worth the effort, because of (2) below. >> 2. Each (virtual) device has own pool of threads, which serves it. >> Threads in each such pools should have a common IO context, but >> different pools should have different IO contexts. So, it would be >> necessary to implement two levels start of IO threads in each pool. At >> first, one thread would be started. Then it would call get_io_context() >> to gain io_context. Then it would create the remaining threads with >> CLONE_IO flag. Definitely, it's a lot more complicated than a simple >> call of alloc_io_context() and assignment of the returned context to >> each just created thread in a loop before they were ran. > > Just start the first thread without CLONE_IO, and subsequent threads > fork off that with CLONE_IO set? Yes, that would be the two stages threads creation. A *LOT* more complicated, than with the direct io_context assignment using alloc_io_context(). > I think we need to make sure that we > allocate an IO context for the 'parent' if it doesn't have one already > and CLONE_IO is set, but that is something that can easily be rectified. Sorry, I don't feel I understood you here.. > It may seem more complex, but if you use this approach you are pretty > much free to worry about any changes in the future there. Worrying about future changes is regular in Linux kernel, where there is no stable API ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/