Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758535AbYLKUqp (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:46:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756486AbYLKUqg (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:46:36 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:1452 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756104AbYLKUqf (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:46:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=AJLrIa6zeDolNJs9fKwBoWcykIXO/4e7Jw6zxzClxh8AHL7KtszQwUqqN47zpnCwA6 +FtxT6LLdzacx6pAEJEiP3NBxhiBhPX3zR1jWMrFO3kApa88a2AEOzB6Fi3Aid776sCR VHSLhEOwBlmSbMf3BD2/epEfap5OrlPDSA1Ow= Message-ID: <84144f020812111246m7f6470f2n8b09283f54ead81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:46:33 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc8 Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Frans Pop" , "Eric Anholt" , nix.or.die@googlemail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, "Arjan van de Ven" , "Yinghai Lu" In-Reply-To: <20081211203604.GA14817@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49407CE1.9090600@googlemail.com> <1228979963.3254.8.camel@gaiman.anholt.net> <200812111707.20857.elendil@planet.nl> <20081211163548.GA11859@elte.hu> <20081211203604.GA14817@elte.hu> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 754dce38ac165400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 726 Lines: 19 Hi Ingo, On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ok. In this case i'd suggest we should just remove the warning. People do > get scared by needless kernel stack dumps - no matter whether it's marked > informational or not. > > So how about the patch below, queued up in tip/x86/debug? Arjan, what do > you think? How come we don't put it under CONFIG_X86_DEBUG or something and hide somewhere in the "Kernel debugging" menu? Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/