Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758305AbYLLDMb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:12:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757007AbYLLDMX (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:12:23 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:36334 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756077AbYLLDMW (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:12:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:12:08 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, lkml , stable@kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] devices cgroup: allow mkfifo Message-Id: <20081211191208.d4d251ad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20081211155027.GB12750@us.ibm.com> References: <20081211155027.GB12750@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1635 Lines: 44 On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:50:27 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote: > The devcgroup_inode_permission() hook in the devices whitelist > cgroup has always bypassed access checks on fifos. But the > mknod hook did not. The devices whitelist is only about block > and char devices, and fifos can't even be added to the whitelist, > so fifos can't be created at all except by tasks which have 'a' > in their whitelist (meaning they have access to all devices). > > Fix the behavior by bypassing access checks to mkfifo (and mksock). > > (Thanks, Daniel, for finding this) > > Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn > Reviewed-by: Li Zefan > --- > security/device_cgroup.c | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/device_cgroup.c b/security/device_cgroup.c > index 5ba7870..df9d491 100644 > --- a/security/device_cgroup.c > +++ b/security/device_cgroup.c > @@ -513,6 +513,9 @@ int devcgroup_inode_mknod(int mode, dev_t dev) > struct dev_cgroup *dev_cgroup; > struct dev_whitelist_item *wh; > > + if (!S_ISBLK(mode) && !S_ISCHR(mode)) > + return 0; > + > rcu_read_lock(); > > dev_cgroup = task_devcgroup(current); hm. I'd looked at your description and decided this was 2.6.29 material. But you think it's for 2.6.28 and even for 2.6.27. How come? (iow, your changelog sucked :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/