Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756981AbYLLHtU (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:49:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750795AbYLLHtI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:49:08 -0500 Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:15653 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750722AbYLLHtH (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:49:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:48:50 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Jens Axboe Cc: Trond Myklebust , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency Message-ID: <20081212084850.1b56529f@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20081211125000.GL23742@kernel.dk> References: <20081211111614.493d2a62@hyperion.delvare> <20081211104109.GF23742@kernel.dk> <20081211115844.1b1dbf49@hyperion.delvare> <20081211110839.GH23742@kernel.dk> <20081211134438.6d871834@hyperion.delvare> <20081211125000.GL23742@kernel.dk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2193 Lines: 76 Hi Jens, On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:50:01 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > Oh right, that's pretty dumb. Lets just do the former, then a later > patch can replace it completely if wanted. > > diff --git a/block/Kconfig b/block/Kconfig > index 1ab7c15..a785e65 100644 > --- a/block/Kconfig > +++ b/block/Kconfig > @@ -23,22 +23,22 @@ menuconfig BLOCK > > if BLOCK > > +config LSF > + bool > + > config LBD > - bool "Support for Large Block Devices" > + bool "Support for Large Block Devices and files" It might be the right time to drop the extra capital letters, for consistency. > depends on !64BIT > + select LSF > help > - Enable block devices of size 2TB and larger. > + Enable block devices or files of size 2TB and larger. > > This option is required to support the full capacity of large > (2TB+) block devices, including RAID, disk, Network Block Device, > Logical Volume Manager (LVM) and loopback. > - > - For example, RAID devices are frequently bigger than the capacity > - of the largest individual hard drive. > - > - This option is not required if you have individual disk drives > - which total 2TB+ and you are not aggregating the capacity into > - a large block device (e.g. using RAID or LVM). > + > + This option also enables support for single files larger than > + 2TB. > > If unsure, say N. > > @@ -57,15 +57,6 @@ config BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE > > If unsure, say N. > > -config LSF > - bool "Support for Large Single Files" > - depends on !64BIT > - help > - Say Y here if you want to be able to handle very large files (2TB > - and larger), otherwise say N. > - > - If unsure, say Y. > - > config BLK_DEV_BSG > bool "Block layer SG support v4 (EXPERIMENTAL)" > depends on EXPERIMENTAL > Acked-by: Jean Delvare As a side note, someone will have to tell me why changing the value of option LSF triggers a full kernel rebuild. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/