Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759296AbYLLSBM (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:01:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757501AbYLLSA4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:00:56 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:59888 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757237AbYLLSA4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:00:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4942A6C5.1090606@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:00:37 -0500 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hugh Dickins CC: KOSAKI Motohiro , Jens Axboe , Jean Delvare , Trond Myklebust , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency References: <20081211202923.330F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20081211113646.GI23742@kernel.dk> <20081211204006.3312.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20081212075844.GH23742@kernel.dk> <49426C16.6040108@redhat.com> <2f11576a0812120711l130e07c3x94ff3b1e64959edf@mail.gmail.com> <494292D4.6090302@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 737 Lines: 19 Hugh Dickins wrote: > Sorry, I'm still puzzled: I thought the unevictable lru was for > shared file pages as well as for anon pages? Of course I agree > with you over the anons (and shm and tmpfs get counted along > with the anons in this context), but wouldn't we still need > an unevictable lru for mlocked shared file pages? Good point, you are correct. I had forgotten about that part completely - keeping CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU may be a good idea after all. -- All Rights Reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/