Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752529AbYLLTBq (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:01:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750886AbYLLTBh (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:01:37 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f12.google.com ([209.85.217.12]:54172 "EHLO mail-gx0-f12.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761AbYLLTBg (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:01:36 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=qyFGCG2HFd9g4zMnDoqdlN1ZIat/pNeNtXiJUDKVvwzJQY/LLnoz6pbTKYv+joqrXg 3kpAEggF3zejfa5XS9tZl9e+dICY/8jTxe5C1UsuxTgNR94oPu+NDfZwjK6cg+BCgBxD QiHVp3FYtWqgSfoNVk0wyd+P3ogGS8zMR7lo4= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:01:34 +0100 From: "Fabio Comolli" To: "Pavel Machek" Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Stefan Richter" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Jay Fenlason" In-Reply-To: <20081212185820.GF11974@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <492DAC81.4020803@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <200811270002.29537.rjw@sisk.pl> <20081212185820.GF11974@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1936 Lines: 56 Hi Pavel On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2008-11-27 22:54:14, Fabio Comolli wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Fabio Comolli wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits >> >> applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest. >> > >> > Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits >> > in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7. >> > >> > I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if >> > the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly, >> > >> > By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems. >> > >> >> Reproduced with 2.6.27.7 with ec.c taken from 2.6.27.4 - after three >> minutes of freeze the laptop came back to normal as nothing had >> happened. > > Is it possible to turn on printk timing, or something? It's already enabled. > If it is > desktop machine, is there chance to pull some data out of the machine > during resume (serial console, debug leds?). It's a laptop without any serial ports unfortunately. > > Could you use Linus' RTC debugging hack, then hard reset machine after > 1.5minute to see where it spends most of the time? I'm almost done with a third bisection session (0 commit to test). If I don't get any useful results I will try it. > Pavel > -- > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html > Regards, Fabio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/