Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754038AbYLLUXd (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:23:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751902AbYLLUXW (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:23:22 -0500 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:41397 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbYLLUXV (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:23:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:23:19 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz To: Pavel Machek cc: smartmontools-support@lists.sourceforge.net, smartmontools-database-owner@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alan Piszcz Subject: Re: Intel X25-E running Linux using XFS In-Reply-To: <20081212185803.GE11974@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: References: <20081212185803.GE11974@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1683 Lines: 44 On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > >> Due to the 100k write cycle lifetime, I will not be performing any more >> benchmarks on the SSD itself, such benchmarks are available on >> techreport.com but just wanted to send out the smart data for the >> smartmontools list and point out it is working with linux+ich7+xfs. >> >> Overall, whenever I do anything now its just like the entire machine is >> sitting in a ramdisk (similar when you boot knoppix and load to ramdisk). >> >> The techreport benchmarks are here: >> http://techreport.com/articles.x/15931 > > Actually I'd like to know... how does it behave during powerfails > while it is being written to? > > Flashes I seen (USB / SD) developed bad sectors in that case, and > ext2/ext3 can't handle that. (And I don't think xfs can handle that > either). I have a UPS for all of my machines, so that will not be a problem in my case. I do not wish to trash a $720 SSD or my current install, if someone else wants to try feel free though :) With barriers, presumably it would be safe-- but as always, a UPS/and barriers and/or RAID, there is no excuse not to have regular backups incase of a failure at any time.. I do recall however one instance where there was an apt-get dist-upgrade going and the power was cut to a machine on purpose (before/not using barriers) and suffice to say-- it got mucked/suffered many corruptions all over the place. Justin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/