Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754593AbYLNLtr (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:49:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752901AbYLNLtf (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:49:35 -0500 Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.17.161]:49297 "EHLO mtagate1.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752438AbYLNLte (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:49:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:49:31 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add preadv and pwritev system calls. Message-ID: <20081214114931.GA4556@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <1229090440-32120-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <20081212152929.GM26095@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081212152929.GM26095@parisc-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2069 Lines: 42 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 08:29:29AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:00:40PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > The patch sports the actual system call implementation and the windup in > > the x86 system call tables. Other archs are TBD. > > > +asmlinkage ssize_t sys_preadv(unsigned long fd, const struct iovec __user *vec, > > + unsigned long vlen, loff_t pos) > > +asmlinkage ssize_t sys_pwritev(unsigned long fd, const struct iovec __user *vec, > > + unsigned long vlen, loff_t pos) > > Are these prototypes required? MIPS and PARISC will need wrappers to > fix them if they are. These two architectures have an ABI which > requires 64-bit arguments to be passed in aligned pairs of registers, > but glibc doesn't know that (and given the existence of syscall(3), > can't do much about it even if it knew), so some of the arguments end up > in the wrong registers. > > Things will go much better if we can prototype these as: > > asmlinkage ssize_t sys_preadv(unsigned int fd, const struct iovec __user *vec, > loff_t pos, unsigned long vlen); > asmlinkage ssize_t sys_pwritev(unsigned int fd, const struct iovec __user *vec, > loff_t pos, unsigned long vlen); > > That way 'pos' ends up split between arg2 and arg3 and vlen ends up in > arg4 instead of having vlen in arg2 and pos in arg3 and arg4 which then > have to be munged to be in arg4 and arg5 by a compat wrapper. > > I seem to recall the s390 folks having some concerns with this kind of > thing too, but I forget what they are, so I'll let them weigh in on > this. I think a lot of stuff that needs to be known for new system calls was written up with these two postings: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=118277150812137&w=2 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/1/354 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/