Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754993AbYLNXLZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:11:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751753AbYLNXLQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:11:16 -0500 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:35468 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751687AbYLNXLP (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:11:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [Bug #12155] Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related From: Dave Kleikamp To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Fabio Comolli , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chuck Ebbert , Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <200812131956.03495.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200812131956.03495.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:11:07 -0600 Message-Id: <1229296267.22016.2.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 708 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 19:56 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Thanks for the update, I have put this information into the Bugzilla entry. > > Would everyone involved agree with reverting the above commit for now and > revisiting the issue in the 2.6.29 time frame? I agree. I can't explain what's wrong, but it seems obvious that my patch either causes or uncovers a more serious problem than it fixed. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/