Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754607AbYLOKWy (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:22:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752606AbYLOKWn (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:22:43 -0500 Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:24280 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752630AbYLOKWl (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:22:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:22:26 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Ben Dooks Cc: David Brownell , Ben Dooks , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPIO: Fix probe() error return in gpio driver probes Message-ID: <20081215112226.18f7fb29@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20081215101616.GB12431@fluff.org.uk> References: <20081212152426.745254309@fluff.org.uk> <20081214213349.GA19483@fluff.org.uk> <200812141611.17555.david-b@pacbell.net> <20081215084600.5d237fea@hyperion.delvare> <20081215101616.GB12431@fluff.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1443 Lines: 32 On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:16:16 +0000, Ben Dooks wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:46:00AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:11:17 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > > On Sunday 14 December 2008, Ben Dooks wrote: > > > > Has anyone reveiwed this patch? Are there any comments, or can this > > > > be commited at somepoint (even if it is during the next merge window)? > > > > > > I was thinking that -EINVAL is almost the least informative > > > diagnostic code possible, since so many places return it > > > that it's usually hard to find out *which* invalid parameter > > > triggered ... > > > > > > Is there a less-overloaded code you could return? > > > > -EINVAL sounds right to me, all that's really missing is dev_dbg() > > messages in the drivers to log what the exact problem was. > > It might be more acceptable to be dev_err(), that way it will get > printed no matter what debug options have been selected. If so, a > seperate patch is probably in order to make the change. As far as I can see, such errors would be caused by development-time mistakes, so dev_dbg() seems appropriate. dev_err() would make the binaries larger for all end-users. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/