Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757559AbYLPHjs (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:39:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755055AbYLPHhT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:37:19 -0500 Received: from mail.bigtelecom.ru ([87.255.0.61]:49986 "EHLO mail.bigtelecom.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755851AbYLPHhR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:37:17 -0500 Message-ID: <49475AA7.70307@bigtelecom.ru> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:37:11 +0300 From: Badalian Vyacheslav User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jarek Poplawski CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: deadlocks if use htb References: <20081010075640.GA5204@ff.dom.local> <48EF17EA.5020306@bigtelecom.ru> <20081010090426.GA6054@ff.dom.local> <20081010095129.GB6054@ff.dom.local> <48F6FB3E.7060903@bigtelecom.ru> <20081016084027.GA17632@ff.dom.local> <48FEC302.5090707@bigtelecom.ru> <20081022070200.GB4178@ff.dom.local> <493FDCD4.5020108@bigtelecom.ru> <20081211084606.GA4129@ff.dom.local> <20081215111308.GA5853@ff.dom.local> In-Reply-To: <20081215111308.GA5853@ff.dom.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1694 Lines: 52 Now i test patches 2+3. 5 pc work without oops 5 days > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:46:06AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:14:28PM +0300, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote: >> >>> Hello again! Sorry for long away. >>> >> Hi! >> >> >>> I was go away from this work for long time. >>> >>> May we return to this bug? >>> Servers at last stable kernel 2.6.27.8 >>> HZ=1000, HR=off, DynamicTicks=off, hysteresis=1 >>> Sorry - no patched, update do not i. Do you have fresh patches or ideas >>> for tests? >>> >> Not much, but I can have if you only are willing to test them... >> I attach below a patch which combines 2 patches I sent yesterday to >> netdev (PATCH 7/6 and 8/6) vs. 2.6.27.7 (named testing patch #3 here). >> >> You can still try the testing patch #2 I sent previously (quoted below) >> with or without this new #3 patch. >> >> > > Here is another idea worth checking (instead of patch #2). > > Jarek P. > > --- (testing patch #4) > > diff -Nurp a2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c b2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c > --- a2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2008-12-11 08:16:16.000000000 +0000 > +++ b2.6.27.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2008-12-15 10:44:32.000000000 +0000 > @@ -924,6 +924,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *htb_dequeue(struc > } > } > sch->qstats.overlimits++; > + qdisc_watchdog_cancel(&q->watchdog); > qdisc_watchdog_schedule(&q->watchdog, next_event); > fin: > return skb; > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/