Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759467AbYLPP4E (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:56:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759171AbYLPPyb (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:54:31 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:55381 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759155AbYLPPya (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:54:30 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: physical memory limit of 64-bit linux Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:54:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar References: <200812161556.25518.ms@teamix.de> In-Reply-To: <200812161556.25518.ms@teamix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812161654.17291.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 845 Lines: 22 On Tuesday, 16 of December 2008, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi! > > What is the physical memory limit for 64-bit Linux? I read about 40 bit > address bus for AMD Athlon X2 (1 TB) and 48 bit for Barcelona X4 (256 TB). > > Is 64-bit linux able to use that amount - provided that one would manage to > build it into a machine? Or does it have a lower limit? > > Looking into the Google crystal ball gives unclear pictures... I tend to > assume that Linux would handle it, but I am not sure. IIRC, the current maximal virtual memory space size of the kernel on x86_64 is 2^46. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/