Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753869AbYLRXkA (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:40:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752601AbYLRXjw (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:39:52 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:41939 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbYLRXjv (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:39:51 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Dave Kleikamp Subject: Re: TSC not updating after resume: Bug or Feature? Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:39:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , dsaxena@plexity.net, Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20081217172758.GA6010@trantor.hsd1.or.comcast.net> <200812182319.57235.rjw@sisk.pl> <1229639149.6613.2.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1229639149.6613.2.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812190039.34184.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1575 Lines: 43 On Thursday, 18 of December 2008, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 23:19 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, 18 of December 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > > Rafael, would something like this explain why we had to revert Shaggy's > > > > patch? > > > > Well, I have yet to understand what the suspend-resume of the timekeeping code > > actually does. > > > > The original description sounds worrisome to me, it looks like we've overlooked > > something at least. > > > > > > His patch fixes the backward motion filter and I'm at an utter > > > > loss why that would break suspend. > > > > > > yes, i'd love to have this commit reinstated: > > > > > > 5b7dba4: sched_clock: prevent scd->clock from moving backwards > > > > > > and the bug triggered by hibernation fixed instead. > > > > Shaggy said he had an idea of what was wrong, so I expect an updated version > > of the patch to appear. > > Not really. I said I'd look at it, but all I know is that it looks like > something clock-related isn't initialized correctly after resume. I > don't know enough to have any idea how to fix it. Well, thanks for the update. I'm going to have a look at the thing tomorrow, but I'm not sure I'll be able to fix it. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/