Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1753851AbYLSA7T@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753851AbYLSA7T (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:59:19 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752145AbYLSA7A
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:59:00 -0500
Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:14737 "EHLO
	g4t0017.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751884AbYLSA67 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:58:59 -0500
Message-ID: <494AF1D0.8060400@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:58:56 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; HP-UX 9000/785; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060601
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: davids@webmaster.com
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, davem@davemloft.net,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop scaring users with "treason uncloaked!"
References: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEJJBPAD.davids@webmaster.com>
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEJJBPAD.davids@webmaster.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1535
Lines: 31

David Schwartz wrote:
>>Most people won't actually think their printer is on fire. But most
>>people WILL think there is serious cause for concern when they see this
>>for the first time in dmesg. Many will search the net for explanations
>>and come away confused and not entirely reassured. And at least one
>>clueless guy will call the police because he still thinks he's under
>>attack.
> 
> 
> Messages about something or other being "illegal" occur about 345 times in
> the Linux kernel source code. Are we going to start patching those too?
> 
> We have "illegal norm", "illegal input", "illegal call", "illegal type",
> "illegal bits", "illegal root port number", "illegal host number", "illegal
> DMA data", "illegal dimensions" (who do you call about that one?), "illegal
> phase", "illegal page number", "illegal seek", and on, and on, and on.
> 
> I suspect that if I submitted a patch to change all of those to "invalid",
> I'd be considered a kook. (Well, more of a kook, anyway.)

All issues of your kookiness aside :) I suspect that the continuing 
spread of "linux" among the masses will mean a need for greater care in 
message wording.  Whether that means that "illegal <foo>" needs to be 
changed I cannot say, but if it does it shouldn't come as a surprise.

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/