Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752692AbYLSCpu (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:45:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752664AbYLSCpZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:45:25 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:49056 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752630AbYLSCpW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:45:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:44:43 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Howells Cc: Christoph Hellwig , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, steved@redhat.com, rwheeler@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches Message-Id: <20081218184443.d73f5431.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <7633.1229653644@redhat.com> References: <20081218123601.11810b7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218224418.804f10bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org> <7633.1229653644@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1526 Lines: 36 On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:27:24 +0000 David Howells wrote: > > Are any distros pushing for this? Or shipping it? If so, are they > > able to weigh in and help us with this quite difficult decision? > > We (Red Hat) have shipped it in RHEL-5 and some Fedora releases. Doing so is > quite an effort, though, precisely because the code is not yet upstream. We > have customers using it and are gaining more customers who want it. There > even appear to be CentOS users using it (or at least complaining when it > breaks). That's useful news. > > I don't know what will convince you. I've given you theoretical reasons why > caching ought to be useful; I've backed up the ones I've implemented with > benchmarks; I've given you examples of what our customers are doing with it or > want to do with it. Was that information captured/maintained somewhere? It really is important (I think) for something of this magnitude. > Please help me understand what else you want. I want to be able to have an answer when someone asks me "why was all that stuff merged". One which I can believe. > Do you perhaps want the netfs maintainers (such as Trond) to say that it's > necessary? Of course, their opinions (and supporting explanations) would be valuable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/