Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752986AbYLSDKk (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:10:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752173AbYLSDKa (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:10:30 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41007 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752137AbYLSDK3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:10:29 -0500 Message-ID: <494B1092.1020600@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:10:10 -0500 From: Ric Wheeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: David Howells , Christoph Hellwig , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, steved@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches References: <20081218123601.11810b7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218224418.804f10bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org> <7633.1229653644@redhat.com> <20081218184443.d73f5431.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20081218184443.d73f5431.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1428 Lines: 36 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:27:24 +0000 David Howells wrote: > > >>> Are any distros pushing for this? Or shipping it? If so, are they >>> able to weigh in and help us with this quite difficult decision? >>> >> We (Red Hat) have shipped it in RHEL-5 and some Fedora releases. Doing so is >> quite an effort, though, precisely because the code is not yet upstream. We >> have customers using it and are gaining more customers who want it. There >> even appear to be CentOS users using it (or at least complaining when it >> breaks). >> > > That's useful news. > The users that I spoke to from the financial sector that tried it are still quite interested. One simple use case for them is a very large cluster of NFS clients for read-mostly workloads (say, 1000 or more NFS clients for shared system partitions). They like the ability to do persistent caching across reboots which allows them to have less (and less beefy) NFS servers for all of those boxes trying to reboot at once. The other use case was for the large rendering customers, but I don't have first hand knowledge of the details... Regards, Ric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/