Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:44:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:43:57 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:6920 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:43:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 21:13:27 -0600 To: Remi Turk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CLONE_NAMESPACE, links for dirs and mount(2) for normal users questions Message-ID: <20001128211327.K8881@wire.cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <3A1FFA2C.A8980FD8@a2zis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A1FFA2C.A8980FD8@a2zis.com>; from remi@a2zis.com on Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 06:43:08PM +0100 From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Remi Turk] > Do I understand correctly that this means hardlinks to directories > (except . and ..) are fundamentally impossible in Linux? Why do you want to be able to do that? Use symlinks or loopback mounts and stay out of trouble. > (I'm thinking about trying to write a garbage collected filesystem > with hardlinks to directories.) Sounds like a lot of extra complexity. Is this academic or do you have a practical use for it? Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/