Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753939AbYLSTb1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:31:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753663AbYLSTbK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:31:10 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com ([209.85.218.21]:57750 "EHLO mail-bw0-f21.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751684AbYLSTbJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:31:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=r03nViyDzA7EKsAHxPED//dzDgnCpGlGnAdN5/c/Z+upnVec8n1xMBib1FNugE/ANb sadOMT/kZGfV+1kK+bLP7MIn3ysepV9bbdXu5tUeTNe6slq73O9S7gH5e3eqVgvKJZtq PxPja4E562aYln6PbKN2AVl661RQ8dMBQ/R74= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide: Fix ata_id_has_dword_io to return DWORD I/O support properly Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:30:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28-rc8-next-20081219; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; ) Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Jeff Garzik , Mario Schwalbe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux IDE mailing list References: <494A5BBF.8000807@inf.tu-dresden.de> <200812190013.10156.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20081219105013.0e43c364@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20081219105013.0e43c364@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812192030.34554.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 26 On Friday 19 December 2008, Alan Cox wrote: > > Sure, we can always improve things further later. However Mario's patch > > is _definitely_ an improvement over the _current_ code. Don't you agree? > > No actually I don't. The current head dev code checks ATA > 7 as the > indicator that this bit is used for treacherous computing. That means the > behaviour for all the older drives is clearly back compatible with old > Linux behaviour. > > Doing it that way around means we don't have any worries about changing > existing behaviours. Please try to verify old Linux behaviour compatiblity statement with some ATA-[2..7] devices... They have old ATA-1 bit set to _zero_... Mario: I don't have anymore time to spend on fixing libata problems so I'll be leaving ata_id_has_dword_io() issues up to libata maintainers, sorry for inconvenience! Thanks, Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/