Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753040AbYLSUk3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:40:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751479AbYLSUkT (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:40:19 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com ([209.85.218.21]:35102 "EHLO mail-bw0-f21.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751431AbYLSUkS (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:40:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; b=WX4/oy7aE6dnh6ELla4uAE3+ApjyocESkmr6TwiTcpgH6DmXASkNAUtZTzFCLPdHfv xJNGSQfE3qZb22U7f4JzfeLEjFTSZXr7RTHck0V0g68RCY9shRDqHR8Z7MRmeXlVOITP NDHeVthinyLGY8isdfwBg4XQiakD583gZdSg0= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ide-cd: first conversion batch Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:15:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28-rc8-next-20081219; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov References: <1229586052-3542-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1229586052-3542-1-git-send-email-petkovbb@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812192115.41068.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1184 Lines: 30 Hi, On Thursday 18 December 2008, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi Bart, > > here's the first batch of conversion patches. Now ide_issue_pc/ide_transfer_pc > are almost completely aligned to their ide-cd counterparts > cdrom_start_packet_command/cdrom_transfer_packet_command. The only thing Looks good generally but I need more time for detailed review. [ Your super-quick action on this has caught me unprepared. ;) ] > missing is the setting of the irq handler through ide_set_handler but this > is not that trivial since if i'd moved ide-cd's irq handler to ide-atapi > that would suck in a bunch of other ide-cd functions which is not what we > want, (yes/no)? and I'm going to have to ponder a little bit more on that. Yes, we don't want to move them over. In worst case we can add ide_handler_t *__old_pc_handler to ide_drive_t and set it in ide-cd (an acceptable hack this time) but there might be better options. Thanks, Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/