Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S290615AbSBLAKl>; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:10:41 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S290618AbSBLAKb>; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:10:31 -0500
Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:22007 "HELO
	executor.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S290615AbSBLAK1>; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:10:27 -0500
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: thread_info implementation 
In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> 
   of "Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:01:50 +0100." <3C685B6E.59076E64@linux-m68k.org> 
User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3
 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.1
 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:10:22 +0000
Message-ID: <22351.1013472622@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Why are you using bitfield instructions on the m68k arch? why not use just
simple bit instructions (or and/or/xor where masking)? All the flags are
single bit width fields.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/