Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:12:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:12:12 -0500 Received: from dsl-65-185-109-125.telocity.com ([65.185.109.125]:20611 "EHLO ohdarn.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:12:03 -0500 Subject: Re: paching 2.5.4 to -pre6??? From: Michael Cohen To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 11 Feb 2002 20:12:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1013476321.26192.2.camel@ohdarn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 06:28, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > hi all > > Is there something wrong with the -pre6 patch? > > I'm trying to patch up the 2.5.4... > > # tar xzf ../packed/k/linux-2.5.4.tar.gz > # cd linux-2.4.5 > # zcat ../../packed/k/patch-2.5.4-pre6.gz | patch -p1 pre6 is already included in 2.5.4. The next patch that applies to 2.5.4 will be 2.5.5-pre1. > patching file CREDITS > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > and so on... patch -p1 -R gives me some hunks, but generally works ... Yes, because you're backing out 2.5.4-pre6's changes. not a good idea. Just leave the 2.5.4 tarball alone for now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/