Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:07:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:06:51 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:40839 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:06:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:04:49 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020211.190449.55725714.davem@redhat.com> To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Cc: anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org Subject: Re: thread_info implementation From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <15464.34183.282646.869983@napali.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <15464.33256.837784.657759@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20020211.185100.68039940.davem@redhat.com> <15464.34183.282646.869983@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Mosberger Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:01:27 -0800 No, it will slow down ia64 and you haven't shown that it helps others. That's crap. You haven't shown this yet, it didn't slow down sparc64 so I doubt you'll be able to. You don't have any facts, you just "think" it will slow things down because of the pointer dereference. I challenge you to show it actually shows up on the performance radar. The thing is going to be fully hot in the cache all the time, there is no way you'll take a cache miss for this dereference. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/