Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:23:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:23:06 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:20616 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:22:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:21:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020211.202108.77059987.davem@redhat.com> To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Cc: anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org Subject: Re: thread_info implementation From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <15464.38684.48286.317465@napali.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <15464.36074.246502.582895@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20020211.194222.34761071.davem@redhat.com> <15464.38684.48286.317465@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Mosberger Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:16:28 -0800 >>>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:42:22 -0800 (PST), "David S. Miller" said: DaveM> I totally beg to DaveM> differ, and I think people like Linus will too. I don't think so. Linus has actually told me and others his opinion of the patch, and he has accepted it whole heartedly. If he didn't accept it, it wouldn't be in the tree right? In fact, why don't you ask him yourself? The "loads are fast on x86" comment I made is basically derived from something he told someone else earlier today wrt. the thread_info stuff. So let me rephrase what you've quoted "I totally beg to differ, and I _know_ people like Linus will too." :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/