Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753222AbYLUWNT (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:13:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751511AbYLUWNE (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:13:04 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f17.google.com ([209.85.219.17]:46341 "EHLO mail-ew0-f17.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853AbYLUWNB (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:13:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:from; b=f4+8nYOScWtx9/lhkQXgr1fQy5zsvx5AKYnO7YBwDyJKf+UJVuPXAf58POyM4qQHCO q1O/KAX3J7hduhTZrzYTamqAuuGCgpIXoJs3m0Rm5pdAG9fu69CEHGIF2qZd9TVyTQz1 APtPZhz7BNbPHxIffgS82j6ck+ZyYaa9cSgB8= Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:12:46 -0500 (EST) X-X-Sender: parag@parag-desktop To: Jiri Kosina cc: Andrew Morton , Parag Warudkar , Anssi Hannula , LKML , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] USBHID: Make Boot Protocol drivers depend on EMBEDDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20081220221253.e09b1b1f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <494E20F7.7050106@gmail.com> <20081221140200.40c1fec1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Parag Warudkar Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1292 Lines: 33 On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > So do I get it right that the only reason of the problem you were > > > seeing was that in the 2.6.27 kernel you have compiled usbhid module, > > > which was then used for driving your mouse,but in 2.6.28-rcX you > > > compiled and used 'usbmouse' instead, and therefore this is not a > > > regression? > > Shouldn't usbmouse support two-dimensional mice as well? > > Yup, but that's a separate issue on my TODO. I first want to know whether > this is a regression or not. > I have always compiled usbmouse as a module - the problem or regression here was that it was loaded instead of usbhid when both were compiled as modules - but I don't think this is a kernel regression, here is why - The problem happened with Fedora 10 - when I booted into Ubuntu 8.10 with the same kernel compiled with same config, usbhid was correctly loaded and mouse worked. So I would forget this as a Fedora specific issue. Thanks for the pointers. Parag -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/