Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:43:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:42:56 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:50310 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:42:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:41:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020211.174102.28786938.davem@redhat.com> To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Cc: anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org Subject: Re: thread_info implementation From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <15464.29104.798819.399971@napali.hpl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <15464.28196.894340.327685@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20020211.173236.08323394.davem@redhat.com> <15464.29104.798819.399971@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Mosberger Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:36:48 -0800 Umh, perhaps because it adds one level of indirection to every access of "current"?? Ummm, which is totally cached and therefore costs nothing? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/