Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S290789AbSBLGU3>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:20:29 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S290792AbSBLGUK>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:20:10 -0500
Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:16412 "EHLO mail.inka.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S290789AbSBLGT6>;
	Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:19:58 -0500
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2002-02@lina.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
In-Reply-To: <20020211225935.B5514@thunk.org>
X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.39 (i686))
Message-Id: <E16aWII-00006J-00@sites.inka.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:19:58 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <20020211225935.B5514@thunk.org> you wrote:
> For What It's Worth, on a laptop environment (where I work quite a
> bit) and for something the size of the Linux kernel, and where things
> change at the speed of the Linux kernel, in fact space efficiency
> matters a lot.

Having the option to have very old revisions as deltas and the current heads
of the most important revisions as full images would satisfy both
requirements. Don't think you work quite often with old pre patches to the
kernel, Ted?

Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/