Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753226AbYLXDw3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:52:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751603AbYLXDwT (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:52:19 -0500 Received: from smtp127.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.186]:23432 "HELO smtp127.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751392AbYLXDwS (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:52:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=IFs8GzU/m/laRhNzvb1OUA1+Y233qvQ4zwjDzDksjG3rnEuFVdoeyM68hU+ALrF6qJ1PkHSAFJEXHq1WKXtNkz/xSOeuXx1W4vTSB9zw8/MlJZ96tGqSeN+opmRgLWViXUWtKrvjsJnUNN39n98J2ABjOFKD6/AbVnM/W9HyeN8= ; X-YMail-OSG: IyTuJJsVM1kdSQzseloqwpWlyYXpMEZ9zYBL5m7OV7slWwHDdMt4Gjmz20wxcCL4GbA8lN11XgEBWR_OzzLJrnP3H.fURROOE4V9wUcLWdyA2QJAMOmJ0GJr7d82iy2FrOmqqZKej2h6jZM9quJd1_3legibdxyK2hNIl2tYJoR_r4VsVBsjhi2MjTgS X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: me@felipebalbi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] musb: fix DaVinci build again Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:52:15 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , gregkh@suse.de, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200812072341.50012.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200812231707.48195.david-b@pacbell.net> <20081224022757.GA10240@frodo> In-Reply-To: <20081224022757.GA10240@frodo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812231952.16171.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1114 Lines: 31 On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > ?#include > > +#include > > you're including twice. Yeah, I suppose I just edited the patch to delete segments that *did* get merged. It looks like that change to got included, and "patch" didn't complain ... leaving the puzzle of just why the *rest* of that pre-2.6.27 build fix still hasn't merged. A double inclusion is a minor-but-harmless annoyance. Those ==> header changes were mostly merged by 2.6.27-rc2, but ones for this particular file got stripped out. More than a small bit puzzling; I can understand patches getting dropped or lost, but not getting mangled like that. When I verify that I have a kernel booting on the DM6446 EVM in mainline, I'll resend both of the patches. They are IMO overdue to merge. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/