Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:43:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:43:46 -0500 Received: from tux.rsn.bth.se ([194.47.143.135]:48579 "EHLO tux.rsn.bth.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:43:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:43:26 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Josefsson To: Alan Cox cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Question about i820 chipset. Message-ID: X-message-flag: Get yourself a real mail client! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alan, I have some small questions... Have you ever tried a motherboard with i820 chipset and two NIC's? I have a Asus P3C-D here (dual pIII 800 with 256MB rimm) and a D-Link DFE570-TX NIC (quad DECchip 21143 behind a DECchip 21152 pci bridge). The problem I'm seeing is extremely crappy pci performance. With one of the NIC's active I see no real problems but when two NIC's are active at the same time all hell breaks loose :( if I generate traffic out via 2 NIC's at the same time I'd expect to get about 2 x 100Mbit/s but in reality I get 2 x 25Mbit/s with this motherboard. and with 3 NIC's active I get about 3 x 15-20Mbit/s. I tried replacing the motherboard with an old SMP board based on the 440bx chipset (cpus underclocked to 600MHz) and then I can easily get 3 x 100Mbit/s with 25-30% cpu used in the machine. So my question is, have you ever seen such pci issues? I've tried all BIOS settings I could find and a lot of diffrent kernels. I've also tried the vanilla tulip-driver and the NAPI'fied one (which I have been helping to test) and both show the exact same performanceproblems. I tried routing a lot of packets and it started dropping a lot of packets when the cpu was only 75% used according to both vmstat and cyclesoak (with an UP kernel). A profile shows that default_idle gets about 25% of the time. I assume the kernel is waiting for the pci bus. And the last question, if you have the hardware, would you mind testing something similar on the Asus A7M266-D? We've been thinking of getting a few of these boards to replace the crappy i820 ones. I saw that you included a patch for MPS 1.4 in -pre9-ac1, was this the same patch you were talking about earlier and does it work? /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/