Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753319AbYLZP2W (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:28:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752200AbYLZP2M (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:28:12 -0500 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.8]:44936 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752084AbYLZP2L (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:28:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:58:04 +0530 From: Kamalesh Babulal To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Yinghai Lu , David Howells , mingo@elte.hu, Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , mel@csn.ul.ie Subject: Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask Message-ID: <20081226152804.GB5100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Kamalesh Babulal References: <86802c440812190351q3118516aif664dd5869c21b2a@mail.gmail.com> <20081219134636.GA11772@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <494C0BF0.3080109@kernel.org> <20081223132127.GA5450@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <495153A4.5060201@kernel.org> <20081224163400.GA11562@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <49529CE1.4040005@kernel.org> <20081226091217.GA5100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4954AC7B.3020603@kernel.org> <20081226102716.GA31450@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081226102716.GA31450@uranus.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3123 Lines: 103 * Sam Ravnborg [2008-12-26 11:27:16]: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 02:05:47AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > > * Yinghai Lu [2008-12-24 12:34:41]: > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > After the applying the patch, the kernel panic's with the same backtrace. The > > > box is running Fedora 5 on it. > > > > > > > please try... > > Ingo, do we need to switch to use #idef and inline function instead? > > I recall David Howells had a similar issue with the bootparamter patch set. > The workaround he used was to add a barrier(); call in the weak function > to avoid the inline. > > [full context kept as I added David to to: list]. > Sam > Hi Yinghai, Thanks, after applying the patch, the kernel boot's up fine. > > > > YH > > > > > > [PATCH] sparseirq: add printk to workaround compiler optimizing > > > > Impact: fix panic on null pointer with sparseirq > > > > some compiler seems to inline the weak global function. > > try to workaround it > > > > also remove duplicated arch_early_irq_init() > > already have one weak copy in init/main.c > > > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai > > > > --- > > init/main.c | 2 ++ > > kernel/irq/handle.c | 7 ++----- > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c > > +++ linux-2.6/init/main.c > > @@ -544,10 +544,12 @@ void __init __weak thread_info_cache_ini > > > > void __init __weak arch_early_irq_init(void) > > { > > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak arch_early_irq_init\n"); > > } > > > > void __init __weak early_irq_init(void) > > { > > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak early_irq_init\n"); > > arch_early_irq_init(); > > } > > > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c > > @@ -56,10 +56,6 @@ void handle_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, st > > int nr_irqs = NR_IRQS; > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nr_irqs); > > > > -void __init __attribute__((weak)) arch_early_irq_init(void) > > -{ > > -} > > - > > #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ > > static struct irq_desc irq_desc_init = { > > .irq = -1, > > @@ -90,8 +86,9 @@ void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *de > > desc->kstat_irqs = (unsigned int *)ptr; > > } > > > > -void __attribute__((weak)) arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu) > > +void __weak arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu) > > { > > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling __weak arch_init_chip_data\n"); > > } > > > > static void init_one_irq_desc(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu) > > -- -- Thanks & Regards, Kamalesh Babulal, Linux Technology Center, IBM, ISTL. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/