Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753870AbYL0IzB (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2008 03:55:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751646AbYL0Iyv (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2008 03:54:51 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41406 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751295AbYL0Iyu (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2008 03:54:50 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 00:54:52 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20081227.005452.261413194.davem@davemloft.net> To: sam@ravnborg.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kenchen@google.com, paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20081223131746.GA7456@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20081222230035.GB4074@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20081222151338.3b6ef997.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081223131746.GA7456@uranus.ravnborg.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by alpha id mBR8t5ki007119 Content-Length: 1026 Lines: 26 From: Sam Ravnborg Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:17:46 +0100 > It may take a few days before the drivers gets fixed. > Christmas is approaching fast by now. Even with this and your driver patch applied, the tree doesn't build successfully: cc1: warnings being treated as errors arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c: In function ‘psycho_check_stc_error’: arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:104: warning: format ‘%016lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long long unsigned int’ Did you remove sparc's -Werror when doing test builds of these changes? :-) Either way these need some work before they should be added to any tree. Andrew you probably want to toss these from your tree since at a minimum they will break the sparc64 build. Sam will fix them up and resubmit, and I'll apply them, don't worry. :) ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?