Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754759AbYL0TXP (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:23:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753714AbYL0TW7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:22:59 -0500 Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:45550 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753509AbYL0TW7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:22:59 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:24:30 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Mike Frysinger , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 byteorder.h: use __asm__/__inline__ for userspace Message-ID: <20081227192430.GC10592@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <1230360604-6711-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20081227071208.GB27736@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20081227084708.GA16077@elte.hu> <20081227185727.GB10442@uranus.ravnborg.org> <49567AC3.4030507@zytor.com> <20081227191223.GA10592@uranus.ravnborg.org> <49567EB5.5030409@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49567EB5.5030409@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1725 Lines: 38 On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:15:01AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:58:11AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >>> I wnet with the scripted conversion for now. > >>> If that does not fly we can come back to this proposal. > >>> > >>> What I like most with the auto conversion is that we avoid > >>> adding yet another special rule about how to do stuff in exported headers. > >>> > >> Indeed, and being keyword conversion, it's independent of context, at > >> least as long as one doesn't have too many run-ins with weird uses of > >> the # and ## preprocessor operators, which are a *lot* easier to rule > >> out globally. > > > > Speaking of what we want to use in exported headers. > > What is the recommendation with respect to uint32_t and friends? > > To my best knowledge they are banned in exported headers as they > > are not part of the kernel namespace and I see few users too. > > But is this something we should check for? > > I personally would not be upset if we auto-changed {su}{8,16,32,64}, > [u]int_{8,16,32,64}_t and bool into the appropriate __{su}{8,16,32,64} > types and _Bool. I think the upside is way bigger than the potential > downside. I was only thinking of a warning so we could have this part cleaned up. It is for the most part a trivial task to do for a volunteer. I could also see some sporadic use of u_int32_t - dunno where it comes from. But looks wrong to me. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/