Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754711AbYL1Jps (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:45:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752795AbYL1Jpj (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:45:39 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42858 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751868AbYL1Jpi (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:45:38 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:45:22 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, jeremy@goop.org, joerg.roedel@amd.com, beckyb@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] swiotlb cleanups Message-ID: <20081228094522.GD9022@elte.hu> References: <1230444127-587-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20081228090537.GA9022@elte.hu> <20081228183522O.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081228183522O.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1338 Lines: 38 * FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:05:37 +0100 > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > > This is minor swiotlb cleanups. It depends on the swiotlb highmem > > > patchset: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git swiotlb > > > > thanks, applied them to tip/core/iommu - after Becky's patchset as ported > > by Jeremy. > > Thanks, > > The log of tip/core/iommu looks really wired. Two patches claim to add > highmem support to swioblb. Becky completely reverts the Jeremy's and > does in a different way without any description. one is Jeremy's that was tested on Xen. The other is Becky's stuff - that also extends it to powerpc - that is not yet fully tested though. > As I wrote, I recommend you to reorder the patches. There is no point to > merge Jeremy's highmem patch. "reordering" commits is not acceptable at this stage, we do append-only steps. If you can see any bug in the end result, let us know. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/