Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755573AbYL2AGU (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:06:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751573AbYL2AGL (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:06:11 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.225]:49462 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750874AbYL2AGK (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:06:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=SbGAqDJ46A3zKIby7ItFlc2SC3UmNo55CHlyTTAr9cMJkd5dkghAhzxYOij+7FsNVI hHfnIq1H1Sl9qR0m7Yab6cqpLsnO+kG8x+1bTgkFphjN4eN8yhOyGeyrO+EDU5CHV/05 nx0zksrvUkfPcuEgY5toDKBI8e/Z2Pr4JBjYM= Message-ID: <86802c440812281606o6e8fbde1ub2e5055f83fea47@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:06:09 -0800 From: "Yinghai Lu" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [git pull] sparseirq / irq updates for v2.6.29 Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Linus Torvalds" , "KOSAKI Motohiro" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Jesse Barnes" , "Kamalesh Babulal" In-Reply-To: <4958120F.4060804@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081225160741.GA14486@elte.hu> <20081227133240.GA8716@elte.hu> <2f11576a0812270927taef068fobbad997dc5e5aacf@mail.gmail.com> <20081227173839.GA9793@elte.hu> <20081228232729.GA2158@elte.hu> <4958120F.4060804@zytor.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 270596737dc4de92 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 962 Lines: 29 On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> ok, agreed. I was hoping for some more generic workaround but nothing >> seemed to keep gcc from inlining such functions. >> > > Other than blacklisting those gcc versions. It's pretty easy to > understand how a bug like that could creep in, since one of the main > improvements of the early gcc4 series was better inlining as an > optimization. 1. one time path add one dummy printk 2. multi path, could move it to another file. could add one like kernel/weak.c to collect those ... > > -- > H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center > I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. good to know. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/