Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753735AbYL2Dpy (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:45:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752217AbYL2Dpo (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:45:44 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:45556 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752051AbYL2Dpm (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:45:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:45:33 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: Andrew Morton , Bernd Schubert , nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steved@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches Message-Id: <20081229144533.4a0ab696.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20081219110539.7e7e230c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org> <20081218123601.11810b7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200812190007.34581.bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> <20081218152616.a24c013f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081219110539.7e7e230c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_14_45_33_+1100_iuBFkyjGgVegFVSl" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1342 Lines: 40 --Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_14_45_33_+1100_iuBFkyjGgVegFVSl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:05:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > Given the ongoing discussions around FS-Cache, I have removed it from > linux-next. Please ask me to include it again (if sensible) once some > decision has been reached about its future. What was the result of discussions around FS-Cache? I ask because it reappeared in linux-next today via the nfs tree (merged into that on Dec 24 and 25) ... --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_14_45_33_+1100_iuBFkyjGgVegFVSl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklYR90ACgkQjjKRsyhoI8w2TwCfbPLtgwfzf5IZvp68VjbeV80G YHQAn3oqSuhjkCpzR0xdnKHm86LACwdN =m9lC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_14_45_33_+1100_iuBFkyjGgVegFVSl-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/