Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752946AbYL2F0j (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:26:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750990AbYL2F02 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:26:28 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:60413 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbYL2F01 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:26:27 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:26:18 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andrew Morton Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Bernd Schubert , nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steved@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches Message-Id: <20081229162618.e2fea7a9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20081228200726.7b7078b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org> <20081218123601.11810b7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200812190007.34581.bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> <20081218152616.a24c013f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081219110539.7e7e230c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081229144533.4a0ab696.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081228200726.7b7078b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_16_26_18_+1100_iXRUVF.IBG7THewh" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1377 Lines: 41 --Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_16_26_18_+1100_iXRUVF.IBG7THewh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew, Trond, On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:07:26 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > And that of course means that many many 2.6.28 patches which I am > maintaining will need significant rework to apply on top of linux-next, > and then they won't apply to mainline. Or that linux-next will not apply > on top of those patches. Mainly memory management. >=20 > Please drop the NFS tree until after -rc1. OK, it is dropped for now (including today's tree). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_16_26_18_+1100_iXRUVF.IBG7THewh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklYX3oACgkQjjKRsyhoI8x2FgCguLyWN0574cD4ck4JmUOp5yF1 DFoAn0lyhgYZEN6ScB+hVnHaT5xu/8/z =bgHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__29_Dec_2008_16_26_18_+1100_iXRUVF.IBG7THewh-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/