Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753324AbYL2FkJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:40:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750849AbYL2Fj5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:39:57 -0500 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.26]:62859 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750801AbYL2Fj4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:39:56 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :x-google-sender-auth; b=War8e5j/Eh9tq+9+wXF+Vy3r0u54ACZpEQYit5lsaA+8f3oV6OZjlEt3zMWQfDyGuF 2sSxWQBg3cqw5/0IOw90NQeQl3eWq9SY+txo0sPMi5bukv7anRHWYIU045DYvnvKjwgy NU6V9bOel49if38cKI7qbZecHPIn95FJxwhI4= Message-ID: <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:39:55 +0700 From: "Igor Podlesny" Reply-To: for.poige+linux@gmail.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is". MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: c028996e97432298 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1337 Lines: 34 Actually that's either a mistake or I don't know what you guys call "a stable version". Since 2.6.24 there're serious regressions in all the following "stable" releases. Both my own experience + http://www.kerneloops.org/ proves that. Just to bring in some examples: -- using 2.6.25.x I started to notice "oops"es in dmesg (what hadn't been happening for a long time). -- since 2.6.26 mine desktop system can't go suspend or hibernate. It tries, but immediately returns from that trying. -- Copying several rather big files (~ 25--45 GiB) from XFS on LVM-2 on MDraid partition to another one, I had the system rebooted both with 2.6.28 and 2.6.27.10 (accomplished using 2.6.24.7-rt(sic!)25). As you probably understand, that's the case you even can't trace where's the problem, at least on a desktop with GUI, not on server with plain text display. Although, I'm afraid even text display wouldn't had a chance to show anything, tracing that problem. So, I don't feel Linux is stable since 2.6.24. Do you? (I'm not subscribed to the list, please cc:) -- End of message. Next message? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/