Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753085AbYL2GE6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:04:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751314AbYL2GEu (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:04:50 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:1440 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbYL2GEt (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:04:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 07:04:45 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Igor Podlesny Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is". Message-ID: <20081229060445.GD6800@1wt.eu> References: <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1721 Lines: 41 On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:39:55PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote: > Actually that's either a mistake or I don't know what you guys call "a > stable version". > > Since 2.6.24 there're serious regressions in all the following > "stable" releases. Both my own experience + http://www.kerneloops.org/ > proves that. > > Just to bring in some examples: > > -- using 2.6.25.x I started to notice "oops"es in dmesg (what hadn't > been happening for a long time). > > -- since 2.6.26 mine desktop system can't go suspend or hibernate. It > tries, but immediately returns from that trying. > > -- Copying several rather big files (~ 25--45 GiB) from XFS on LVM-2 > on MDraid partition to another one, I had the system rebooted both > with 2.6.28 and 2.6.27.10 (accomplished using 2.6.24.7-rt(sic!)25). As > you probably understand, that's the case you even can't trace where's > the problem, at least on a desktop with GUI, not on server with plain > text display. Although, I'm afraid even text display wouldn't had a > chance to show anything, tracing that problem. > > So, I don't feel Linux is stable since 2.6.24. Do you? Well, I won't say that I find them 100% rock solid, but you seem to be able to reproduce a lot of serious issues. Have you filed bug reports to get them fixed ? You cannot expect people to fix bugs they're not aware of ! Also it would be a good idea to get all those issues fixed soon, because 2.6.27-stable will be maintained for a long time. Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/