Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754723AbYL2KCD (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:02:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752982AbYL2KBx (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:01:53 -0500 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.26]:33478 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752737AbYL2KBx (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2008 05:01:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Y8LUb0rJ6hcM39O2QIcb2tOTlS38js9QVwd0BLahCs63iuGiDeZze0JjmzgGI0RMCm 8CoIPkzUUACK6NiGQZevjh4/VBnoVD/Yex5olrZWr/il3n50IomnXKwMAVbWLoN6I/MR x1GpwzgKGJb7ii6up+QRNPwJpEsa6RMajq9VA= Message-ID: <43d009740812290201x30cadf9bx61c525f380746e64@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:01:51 +0700 From: "Igor Podlesny" Reply-To: for.poige+linux@gmail.com To: "Christoph Hellwig" Subject: Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is". Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <20081229092124.GA18987@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com> <20081229092124.GA18987@infradead.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: fcdff11b2b39d158 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1688 Lines: 35 2008/12/29 Christoph Hellwig : > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:39:55PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote: >> -- Copying several rather big files (~ 25--45 GiB) from XFS on LVM-2 >> on MDraid partition to another one, I had the system rebooted both >> with 2.6.28 and 2.6.27.10 (accomplished using 2.6.24.7-rt(sic!)25). As >> you probably understand, that's the case you even can't trace where's >> the problem, at least on a desktop with GUI, not on server with plain >> text display. Although, I'm afraid even text display wouldn't had a >> chance to show anything, tracing that problem. > > You don't have 4K_STACKs enabled by default, do you? x86_64, so it's not applicable. I see you've included XFS guys, but that's hard to guess which sub-system is related to that crash, cause it's a stacked construction XFS/LVM-2/Linux Software RAID/sata_nv. Also, I've found there were some complaints bout netfilter's ipt_recent, which I was using, so I've decided to turn it off and see. > > And instead of these rants bug reports would be more useful. > Yeah, I'll try to get backtraces, using null-modem cable, but alas, I don't have it yet. Nowadays it's not a thing easy to buy at a computer store. Also, my message (feedback) was written due to concerns bout quality degradation I saw. May be I was mistaken or not, but I felt it's better to talk about it to people who really cared and knew. -- End of message. Next message? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/