Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:53:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:53:03 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:16004 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:52:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:50:51 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020212.075051.14974554.davem@redhat.com> To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Cc: stodden@in.tum.de, groudier@free.fr, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, zaitcev@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pci_pool reap? From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020212154816.E31425@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020211.184412.35663889.davem@redhat.com> <1013528224.2240.245.camel@bitch> <20020212154816.E31425@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Russell King Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:48:16 +0000 If you're really interested in the outcome, please examine the lkml archives. The conclusion we came to is that there is no reason you can't do the remapping from interrupts on ARM and propagate the GFP_ATOMIC properly as well. Right? Or is this another "I'm not going to make the change until it is required of me" situation? If so I'll just make it so :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/