Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:48:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:48:00 -0500 Received: from mons.uio.no ([129.240.130.14]:16799 "EHLO mons.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:47:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15465.21813.120817.244034@charged.uio.no> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:47:33 +0100 To: Dave Hansen Cc: Chuck Lever , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove BKL from NFS read/write code + SunRPC... In-Reply-To: <3C695401.8040503@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <15465.476.953349.720240@charged.uio.no> <3C695401.8040503@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no From: Trond Myklebust Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Dave Hansen writes: > Trond Myklebust wrote: >> The following patch strongly reduces BKL contention within the >> NFS read/write code, and within the generic RPC layer. > Do you have any benchmarks which showed BKL contention in the > NFS code? > I'm not trying to criticize, I think the patch is wonderful. > I want > to have some more numbers to say, "Look! The BKL _is_ bad!" See Chuck's paper on http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfs-perf/results/cel/write-throughput.html Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/