Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:26:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:26:41 -0500 Received: from naughty.monkey.org ([204.181.64.8]:45960 "HELO naughty.monkey.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:26:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:26:28 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Lever To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Dave Hansen , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove BKL from NFS read/write code + SunRPC... In-Reply-To: <15465.21813.120817.244034@charged.uio.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org there's also a technical report that describes work we did recently to improve write performance, which summarizes the web page Trond listed below. see http://www.citi.umich.edu/techreports/reports/citi-tr-01-12.pdf we're publishing a revised version in the June 2002 Usenix technical conference proceedings; if you intend to cite the paper, we'd prefer that you cited that one instead. On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>> " " == Dave Hansen writes: > > > Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> The following patch strongly reduces BKL contention within the > >> NFS read/write code, and within the generic RPC layer. > > > Do you have any benchmarks which showed BKL contention in the > > NFS code? > > I'm not trying to criticize, I think the patch is wonderful. > > I want > > to have some more numbers to say, "Look! The BKL _is_ bad!" > > See Chuck's paper on > > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfs-perf/results/cel/write-throughput.html > > > Cheers, > Trond > - Chuck Lever -- corporate: personal: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/