Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752995AbYLaA1T (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:27:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751950AbYLaA1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:27:10 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:36792 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751854AbYLaA1J (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:27:09 -0500 To: Peter W Morreale Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pdflush fix and enhancement From: Andi Kleen References: <20081230231152.10427.50620.stgit@hermosa.site> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:28:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20081230231152.10427.50620.stgit@hermosa.site> (Peter W. Morreale's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:12:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87fxk5ur0h.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 868 Lines: 24 Peter W Morreale writes: > The following series implements a fix for pdflush thread creation and an > enhancement for allowing the setting of the minimum and maximun number > of pdflush threads. You forgot to state why the admin should control that? Each sysctl essentially presents a failure of the automatic tuning algorithms of the kernel (kernel hackers admitting defeat). So a patch adding new ones at least needs a clear rationale what problem it is trying to fix and why the automatic tuning cannot be fixed instead to address this case without new knobs. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/