Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:58:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:57:59 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([216.36.33.161]:60323 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:57:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:57:22 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com Subject: Re: File BlockSize Message-ID: <20020212205722.GH767@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com In-Reply-To: <002e01c1b397$1a26d270$3c00a8c0@baazee.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:37:43PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > Going to a block size bigger than page size causes all sorts of fun with > allocation failures if there are not two pages free adjacent to one another > when allocating, and isn't really worth the cost. This sounds like fairly severe memory fragmentation, which seems more worrisome to me than blocksize constraints. Should I look into that? Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/