Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755421AbYLaIPV (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:15:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752101AbYLaIPG (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:15:06 -0500 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:4808 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752096AbYLaIPE (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:15:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i1g4v3QaIRYtJlsyTAYgFDNyqjT7rz/h8crTu/yh+iVEtDO8P+zezklR2MPDGlnWQo DRwJrCcRtPD2DrOaIsUj810WRr/mKqZSlCTfDzXOMpq3p/MZQZ5FsOYJ/iq06yseGTRy b16bwbhjkZ9/teXVXNpw+Yo7Ad7KzjWLGiJtM= Message-ID: <495B2A02.5010701@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:14:58 -0800 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Phillips CC: tux3@tux3.org, sniper , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Tux3] Tux3 report: A Golden Copy References: <200812301935.49303.phillips@phunq.net> <9bd6b5360812302334t2c6aca67s62ba54438d2bda9e@mail.gmail.com> <200812310000.55256.phillips@phunq.net> In-Reply-To: <200812310000.55256.phillips@phunq.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1835 Lines: 49 Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 30 December 2008 23:34, sniper wrote: > >> Great, I have mounted tux3 filesystem under UML with stuffs in this mail, >> but I still can't debug it with gdb. Anyone gives me suggestion? >> > > You just have to give a "cont" command a bunch of times and you will > eventually get to a command prompt. The reason for this is, uml uses > the segfault interrupt as part of its machine simulation, and there > is no exsiting way for uml and gdb to communicate in such a way that > uml can recognize that the interrupt came from its own code and filter > it. > > Jeff Dike is the expert on this, and Daniel Jacobowitz is the expert > on the gdb side. Fixing this would be a big effort, getting two complex > systems to cooperate better, with nontrivial API issues to solve. But > UML is such a wonderful kernel development tool that it might be worth > the effort. > > In the mean time, you could just tell gdb to mask off all segfaults, > but would be kind of problematic for debugging. > > Regards, > > Daniel > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > Hmm.. seems like a redundancy; Anyways I looked at you're site, but am still confused at what tux3 is: what is tux3? (at first I thought it was a video game, but was wrong); can I use tux3 to secure a linux system or is it for something else? regards; Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/