Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:00:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:59:56 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:50189 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:59:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:59:34 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Larry McVoy Cc: Ingo Molnar , Tom Rini , Linus Torvalds , Daniel Phillips , Alexander Viro , Rob Landley , linux-kernel Subject: Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin In-Reply-To: <20020130092529.O23269@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > and then you added one change below that, multiple times. If you were to > combine all of those changes in a BK tree, it would look like > > [older changes] > v > [2.5.3-pre4] > v > [2.5.3-pre5] > [sched1] [sched2] [sched3] [sched4] [sched5] [sched6] [sched7] I'm porting rmap to 2.5 now, doing just this. One thing I noticed was that the space usage of all the bk trees I'm using in order to keep the different changes individually pullable is about 1.5 GB now. Not too big an issue for me, but it might be an issue if every bkbits.net user starts doing this ... ;) cheers, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/