Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:49:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:48:57 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-038.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.38]:15749 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:48:40 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy , Tom Lord Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 01:52:20 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: tytso@mit.edu, lm@bitmover.com, jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU, jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200202122028.MAA24835@morrowfield.home> <20020212145412.E25559@work.bitmover.com> In-Reply-To: <20020212145412.E25559@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 12, 2002 11:54 pm, Larry McVoy wrote: > And it's not like this makes arch bad, this is one place where it isn't as > good as some other choices. But arch has other areas where it is better, > it is less pedantic than most systems about what it will try and apply. > It's the uber patch library if you ask me, and that has real value. > Why the patchbot people haven't picked up on that is beyond me, they're > off trying to write something "simple", which I think you'll agree is > a strange, there is nothing simple about this problem space. The patchbot people, at least one of them, is busy working on a totally unrelated problem ;-) I'm keeping an eye on this. The patchbot version 1.0 will in fact be simple and useful at the same time or I'd better seriously consider retiring. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/