Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752349AbYLQVG1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:06:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751214AbYLQVGR (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:06:17 -0500 Received: from sandeen.net ([209.173.210.139]:20120 "EHLO sandeen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751056AbYLQVGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:06:16 -0500 Message-ID: <494969C6.4090500@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:06:14 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Fasheh CC: Ankit Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel.becker@oracle.com, Christoph Hellwig , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] [PATCH][RFC] fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls References: <49460F88.2080408@ankitjain.org> <20081217202815.GE8791@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20081217202815.GE8791@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Fasheh wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:34:24PM +0530, Ankit Jain wrote: >> This patch adds ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy XFS >> pre-allocation ioctls (XFS_IOC_*RESVP*). The implementation >> effectively invokes sys_fallocate for the new ioctls. >> Note: These legacy ioctls are also implemented by OCFS2. >> >> There are some things that I'm not sure about: >> 1. Should the struct space_resv be exposed to user-space? If not, >> then what would be the right place to put it? And the ioctl >> definitions? > > Yes. As far as where to put it, I'm not sure. Maybe falloc.h? I'd sort of rather not; why should that legacy struct space_resv be available in a header... I thought this was for people already using the xfs ioctl, in which case they are already using the xfs header... and if they want preallocation in any new work, they should use fallocate() instead, yes? I mean it wouldn't hurt anything but it sort of confuses the interface story IMHO. -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/