Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291339AbSBMEDT>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 23:03:19 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291340AbSBMEDJ>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 23:03:09 -0500
Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:30215 "EHLO
	gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S291339AbSBMECy>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 23:02:54 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 23:01:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
cc: Ro0tSiEgE <ro0tsiege@bjstuff.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stable Kernel
In-Reply-To: <20020213015054.GA11021@codepoet.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020212225429.8017D-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Erik Andersen wrote:

> On Tue Feb 12, 2002 at 07:33:23PM -0600, Ro0tSiEgE wrote:
> > What is the most stable/secure kernel version at this point?
> 
> 2.0.39

One of the links between my fingers and the list is 2.0.33, but I would
not install anything but 2.4 on a new install. I get uptimes in the 200+
day range with 2.4 and far better performance and networking.

Note that I agree on what's most stable, but if the question is what
should I install, 2.4.xx is the choice. 2.4.13-ac was very stable, but I'm
sure 2.4.17-ac2 will be as well. Alan actually runs his kernels, so they
will compile and run.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/